Journal of the Code of Ethics Editing
Determine the name of the journal, scientific scope, periodicity (periodic), and accreditation.
Determine the membership of the Editorial Board.
Defines the relationship between Publishers, Editors, Reviewers, and other parties in a contract.
Appreciate the confidentiality of researchers, writers, editors, and reviewers who have contributed.
application of norms and regulations regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
conduct a review of the journal's policy and submit it to the Author, Editorial Board, Reviewers, and Readers.
Create code of conduct guidelines for Editors and Reviewers.
Publish journals regularly.
Provision of available sources of funds for sustainable journal publishing.
Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
completeness of licensing and other legal aspects.

Code of Ethics Editor's Journal
continuous improvement of publication quality,
Implementation of a process to ensure the quality of published papers,
Promote freedom of expression,
maintain the integrity of the author's academic record,
Submit corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies if needed,
Having responsibility for the style and format of the work, while the content and statements in the work are the responsibility of the author,
Actively solicit or receive opinions from Authors, Readers, Reviewers, and members of the Editorial Board to improve the quality of publications,
Reviewing the effects of publication policies on the attitudes of Authors and Reviewers and improving them to increase responsibility and minimize errors,
Have an open mind to new opinions or views of others that may differ from personal opinions,
Do not defend your own opinion, the author or third parties that can result in an unobjective decision,
Encouraging writers to be able to make improvements to their writings so that they are worthy of publication.

SIGMA Reviewer Code of Ethics
Receive assignments from the Editor to review the written work and submit the results to the Editor, as consideration for publishing the paper.
or not to conduct a review of the written work involving him,
Maintain the author's privacy by not disseminating the results of corrections, suggestions, and recommendations
Encouraging writers to make improvements to their writings by providing corrections, suggestions, and recommendations
Prioritizing the principles of truth, novelty, and originality for scientific, applied, and innovative development.
Refuse to do a review if the paper is not from the field of expertise. Seyogyya gives recommendations to other reviewers who are more expert in the field of the paper
Reviewing the written work that has been corrected according to predetermined standards.
Papers that are reviewed may not be used for personal gain. In addition, the use of the contents of the written work must obtain permission from the author.
Reviewing the work in a timely manner according to the style of publication guidelines based on the scientific method (data collection methods, author's legality, conclusions, etc.).

Author Code of Ethics
Have responsibility and contribution in planning, drafting, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, revision, and integrity of writing.
Discussing from the beginning about the inclusion of the author's name if there is more than one author's name to avoid rejection.
State the resources and funds for the written work,
Use of material from other publications that are copyrighted, must obtain permission from the relevant party
limitations in research
Notify the editor or publisher immediately if there are errors in the writing
comments made by reviewers in a professional and timely manner.
Inform the Editor if he will withdraw his written work.
Respect publishers by not publishing written works in other forms and through other media before publication
A statement that the paper submitted for publication is original, has not been visited in any language, and is not in the process of being submitted to another Publisher.