UNIRA LAW JOURNAL

AKIBAT HUKUM KESALAHAN DIAGNOSIS DOKTER DALAM PELAYANAN KESEHATAN ONLINE DALAM HUKUM PERDATA

Sri Wahyu Ningsih , Adriana Pakendek — Wed, 16 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000

ABSTRACT

The development of online-based health services in Indonesia is now increasingly widespread. Online-based health services as a development of telemedicine have positive and negative impacts. One of the positive impacts is that it makes it easier for users as patients to be able to consult and get health services anytime and anywhere without any distance and time constraints. However, this application-based health service also has a negative impact, namely because the online diagnosis process by doctors is carried out without directly/not face to face with the patient. If a misdiagnosis by a doctor occurs, the doctor should be held accountable. The results of this study indicate that there are no national provisions that specifically regulate online health services, so that the current reality questions the legal validity of doctors who practice using online health services. In addition, it is also necessary to realize that the use of online health services or patients still have many obstacles in consulting from time, signal constraints and unclear communication so that it becomes a possibility of errors in diagnosing the disease.

ANALISIS KELEMAHAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM PENANGGULANGAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG MELALUI CRYPTOCURRENCY

Moh. Jose Sulaiman, Mahsun Ismail — Wed, 16 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000

Diversi This study aims to analyze the weaknesses of Indonesian criminal law in combating money laundering crimes (TPPU) through cryptocurrency. The method used is normative juridical research, employing a literature review of legislation, court rulings, PPATK reports, and primary literature from the past five years. The findings reveal at least three primary sources of weakness: (1) substantive law weaknesses due to the lack of clear regulation of crypto assets in Law No. 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering; (2) procedural law/investigation weaknesses, including limitations in tools and standards for tracing digital assets across platforms (CEX/DEX); and (3) institutional weaknesses stemming from fragmented authority among Bappebti, OJK, PPATK, and law enforcement agencies. Common money laundering methods via cryptocurrency typically involve wallet preparation, use of centralized/decentralized exchanges, transaction layering, and reintegration into the financial system. Recommendations include amending Law No. 8 of 2010 to explicitly regulate crypto assets, enhancing forensic capacity for crypto assets and case handling procedures, and establishing a specialized inter-agency task force. The findings emphasize the need for regulatory synchronization and strengthened law enforcement to address gaps in the exploitation of cryptocurrency for money laundering

DISPARITAS PEMIDANAAN OLEH HAKIM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA TENTANG PERKOSAAN

satriyoso, Mahsun Ismail — Wed, 16 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000

This study examines the many disparities in judges' decisions in determining a decision, especially in rape cases, which were recorded. This year, CATAHU recorded the dynamics of complaints of rape cases that occurred in Indonesia in 2023, namely 289,111. The existence of disparities in judges' decisions related to the same case but in different decision results always backfires on society with a sense of injustice, where the occurrence of these differences in decisions is based on several judges' considerations in producing accurate decisions. Therefore, a judge in making a decision must really consider fairly, wisely and have a comprehensive understanding of the case. Based on these problems, the formulation of the problem in this thesis research includes (1) What causes the disparity factor in judges' decisions in rape cases? (2) How are the judges' considerations so that disparities occur in decisions No. 16 / Pid.B / 2023 / Pn Mak and Number 2198 / Pid.B / 2023 / Pn Mdn?. The research method used is normative juridical research, meaning an approach taken by examining theories, concepts, and relevant legislation.

The results of the study indicate that 1) the causes of disparity in judges' decisions in rape cases are: first, because the law provides a broad interpretation for judges with a maximum prison sentence of twelve years, allowing judges to impose different sanctions as long as they do not exceed the maximum limit. The reasons are apparent in each case. Third, the methods and motives of the defendants differed. Fourth, the resulting consequences also differed. 2) The judges' considerations that led to the disparity in decisions No. 16/Pid.B/2023/Pn Mak and No. 2198/Pid.B/2023/Pn Mdn: 1) legal considerations, namely the public prosecutor's indictment, the defendant's and witness statements, and the evidence. 2) non-legal considerations such as the perpetrator's background, the consequences of the perpetrator's actions, aggravating and mitigating circumstances, and the defendant's motives.

KEKUATAN HUKUM PERJANJIAN PAROAN ANTARA PEMILIK TANAH DAN PENGGARAP DI DESA PANGELEN

rangga, Achmad Rifai — Wed, 16 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000

The The sharecropping system is a cooperation between two people: one has a garden and the other cultivates it. They will share the harvest from the garden according to the agreement made without violence. Both the owner and the cultivator benefit, as the landowner does not have to labor to manage the garden because the cultivator is doing it. This is stated in Article 1313 of the Civil Code, which reads: "An agreement is an act in which one or more persons bind themselves to one or more persons" (Civil Code). Based on Article 1 letter C of Law No. 2 of 1960. This research uses juridical empirical methods with interviews. Social interaction in the community can be understood through qualitative research. Researchers will explain social interactions by collecting documents, observations, and interviews. The resolution of disputes between landowners and land cultivators in Sampang Regency, the approach taken by village heads in resolving their dispute issues, after hearing and understanding the contested problems in more depth, the pathway to dispute resolution is to address the outcome issues by asking who bears the unwanted risks that cause the dispute. Once the problems are resolved, landowners and cultivators can choose to continue the profit-sharing agreement or not. In cases of profit sharing, disputes may arise regarding how to calculate the remaining profits from the harvest sharing that are considered unfair.

PERSYARATAN PUTUSAN SERTA MERTA DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA PADA SENGKETA HARTA BERSAMA

Satria Ali Pahlevi , Achmadrifai94 — Wed, 16 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000

The joint property dispute between Widjoko and Lim Si Min and Edward Winarto filed at the Medan District Court was decided with immediate verdict. This research aims to find out the requirements for a case to be decided with a decision immediately, and the legal consequences of the decision. By using normative legal research methods, through case approach and statute approach, as well as primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The collection of legal materials is done by studying various literatures. Then later it will be analyzed, and the results will be described in the form of logical and systematic sentences. The results of this study prove that the imposition of a verdict as well as its mertanya meets the requirements of a verdict as well as the existence of authentic evidence or previous court decisions that have obtained permanent legal force that have a relationship with the subject matter of the lawsuit filed. The legal consequences of the decision immediately result in the execution of the decision can be carried out directly even though it is not yet legally binding and even though Defendant I and Defendant II filed a legal action.