ANALISIS YURIDIS PERIKATAN NOTARIS TERHADAP KLIEN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG JABATAN NOTARIS

Wyda Lusiana, Ratih Dwi Pangestu

Abstract


Abstrak

Perikatan notaris terhadap klien memiliki peran sentral dalam memberikan kepastian hukum di Indonesia, khususnya dalam pembuatan akta autentik yang menjadi dasar transaksi hukum. UU Jabatan Notaris mengatur hubungan hukum antara notaris dan klien, menetapkan kewajiban notaris untuk memastikan keabsahan dokumen serta memberikan penjelasan yang memadai kepada klien. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perikatan notaris terhadap klien berdasarkan ketentuan yang ada dalam UU Jabatan Notaris dan mengeksplorasi implikasi hukum dari hubungan tersebut dalam praktik hukum Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif, penelitian ini menggali tugas dan wewenang notaris dalam melaksanakan tugas notariat serta tanggung jawab hukum mereka jika terjadi penyalahgunaan wewenang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perikatan notaris memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak, tetapi masih terdapat tantangan dalam implementasi regulasi yang dapat mengurangi efektivitas perlindungan hukum terhadap klien. Oleh karena itu, disarankan untuk memperbaiki sistem pengawasan dan regulasi terkait profesi notaris, serta memperkuat perlindungan hukum bagi klien dalam perikatan ini. Pembaruan regulasi yang mengintegrasikan teknologi dan penguatan pengawasan diharapkan dapat meningkatkan transparansi dan profesionalisme dalam praktik notariat, serta memperkecil potensi penyalahgunaan wewenang oleh notaris. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi dalam pengembangan ilmu hukum dan praktik notariat yang lebih adil dan akuntabel di Indonesia.

Kata kunci: perikatan notaris

References


Afrian, Robiatul. “legal consequences of cooperation between notary partners and banks on the validity of the deeds made.” Authentica 7, no. 1 (August 30, 2024): 23–36. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.atc.2024.7.1.446.

Bella Dalila, Dian Eriani, and Ade Soraya. “The Legal Position Of The Authentic Deed Whose Fingerprints Are Not Attached To The Deed Minuta Is Reviewed From Law Number 2 Of 2014 Concerning The Amendment Of Law Number 30 Year 2004 About The Department Of Notary.” Kalijaga : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Mahasiswa 1, no. 4 (August 16, 2024): 135–41. https://doi.org/10.62523/kalijaga.v1i4.26.

Denzin, Norman K, and Yvonna S Lincoln. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications. New Delhi, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465640610666642.

Diatnika, Dewa Gede Aldian, and I Made Dwi Dimas Mahendrayana. “the implementation of the legal certainty principle in determining the ability to make notarial deeds before a notary.” policy, law, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) 1, no. 4 (November 24, 2022): 31–38. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i4.450.

Djunaedi, D Djunaedi. “Juridical Analysis Related To Confidentiality Of Notary Liability.” Jurnal Daulat Hukum 4, no. 1 (May 21, 2021): 91. https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v4i2.15576.

Dwi Dharmayanthi, Ni Nengah, Benny Djaja, and Maman Sudirman. “Notary Liability on Contract Renegotiation in Business Contracts.” Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi 5, no. 7 (July 19, 2024): 3157–64. https://doi.org/10.59141/jist.v5i7.1216.

Hustam Husain, Kahar Lahae, and Marwah. “making a notary deed that provides legal certainty.” Awang Long Law Review 5, no. 1 (November 30, 2022): 180–88. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v5i1.548.

Iryadi, Irfan, Teuku Syahrul Ansari, Jumadil Saputra, Teuku Afrizal, and Ahmad Syauqi Thirafi. “The Role of Jurisprudence as Form of Legal Prescriptions: A Case Study of Notaries in Indonesia.” WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT 17 (January 8, 2021): 75–80. https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2021.17.8.

Karimova, Madina. “‘The concept of notarial process and its characteristic features.’” Jurisprudence 4, no. 3 (June 24, 2024): 26–33. https://doi.org/10.51788/tsul.jurisprudence.4.3./XJHF4187.

Koesnadi, Merry, John Pieris, and Aarce Tehupeiory. “The Role of a Notary in Making a Choice of Law of an International Business Contract.” International Journal of Social Service and Research 3, no. 4 (April 14, 2023): 915–18. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i4.322.

Ladina, L., and M. Veselov. “Legal Responsibility of a Private Notary.” National Technical University of Ukraine Journal. Political Science. Sociology. Law, no. 1(49) (June 8, 2021): 145–50. https://doi.org/10.20535/2308-5053.2021.1(49).233117.

Mikhaylova, Ekaterina V. “Notarial Acts as a Means of Protection of Rights of the State.” Notary 2 (May 4, 2023): 9–13. https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1204-2023-2-9-13.

Nuroini, Indi, Akfah Zakiah Jamilah, Agung Wildan Azizi, and Ajeung Syilva Syara Noor Silmi Sudrajat. “Exploring the Role of Notaries in Common Law and Civil Law Legal Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Authentic Deed Making.” Journal of Strafvordering Indonesian 1, no. 3 (July 27, 2024): 20–28. https://doi.org/10.62872/q77xbj15.

Pakpahan, Elvira Fitriyani, Vivi Prisilla, Dicky Dicky, and Yuni Adriana Malau. “peran dan kewenangan profesi penunjang pasar modal (notaris) dalam menghadapi era globalisasi.” JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) 5, no. 2 (March 30, 2020): 323. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v5i2.239.

Pamitama, Laberqi. “tanggung jawab hukum notaris terhadap akta autentik yang dibuat dihadapannya (analisis putusan nomor 2022 K/PDT/2013).” UNES Law Review 3, no. 2 (January 12, 2021): 136–48. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v3i2.153.

Prasetyo, Wakhid. “Normative Legal Analysis of Notary Code of Ethics: Improving Legal Professional Ethical Standards.” Journal of Law Science 6, no. 3 (July 30, 2024): 549–59. https://doi.org/10.35335/jls.v6i3.5347.

Prianto, Agung, Anriz Nazaruddin Halim, and Yudha Cahya Kumala. “kepastian hukum kekuatan akta otentik terhadap para penghadap yang mengandung klausula eksonerasi dikaitkan dengan tanggung jawab notaris.” SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah 3, no. 3 (March 3, 2024): 1191–99. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v3i3.2404.

Priyanto, Gagah Putra, Suraji Suraji, and Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi Nugraheni. “notary liability for the deed of loan and loan agreement that is legally defective and canceled by the judge.” ANAYASA : Journal of Legal Studies 2, no. 2 (January 31, 2025): 70–78. https://doi.org/10.61397/ays.v2i2.329.

Rahim, Yulfita, Syafrinaldi Syafrinaldi, S. Thamrin, and Heni Susanti. “Legal Protection of Notary Officials According to Indonesian Positive Law.” Technium Social Sciences Journal 28 (February 9, 2022): 344–55. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v28i1.5468.

Saputro, Joko, and Mohamad Fajri Mekka Putra. “Pengesahan Perjanjian Kredit Jual Beli Rumah Oleh Notaris Yang Bukan Pembentuk Surat Pernyataan.” JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan) 6, no. 3 (July 10, 2022). https://doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v6i3.3386.

Sara, Rineke, and Theresia Trisnaning. “Law Enforcement Against The Criminal Act of Forgery of Documents By a Notary In The Perspective of Law No. 30 of 2004 Concerning The Implementation of Administrative Sanctions or The Notary’s Code of Ethics.” Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains 4, no. 12 (December 20, 2023): 1257–63. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v4i12.933.

Soegianto, Soegianto. “professional ethics and legal protection for notary.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 6, no. 2 (May 4, 2020). https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v6i2.7897.

Sosonovych, M. V. “Problems and Prospects of Notarization of Family Contracts.” Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law 2, no. 86 (January 6, 2025): 207–12. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2024.86.2.32.

Supriyanto, Agus Supriyanto, and Adi Sulistyono. “Analysis of the Principle of Notary Independence in Notarial Deed Making in Review of the Notary Position Law and the Notary Professional Code of Ethics.” International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences 5, no. 3 (June 30, 2024): 536–40. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v5i3.836.

Tejakusuma, Erwin Kunta, Dwi Endah Nurhayati, and Samuel Saut Martua Samosir. “The Obligation of Notary as a Reporter in Efforts to Prevent and Eradicate Money Laundering Crime.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 5, no. 1 (May 12, 2024): 28. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v5i1.46678.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.53712/yustitia.v26i1.2676

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.