ANALISIS TINDAK TUTUR ILOKUSI UJARAN KEBENCIAN PADA ETNIS TIONGHOA DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA

Muhammad Abu Hafit

Abstract


This study describes the types and functions of hate speech against ethnic Chinese in the decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The research method uses descriptive qualitative. Data collection uses the method of observing and noting. The results of the study show that there are types and functions of illocutionary speech acts in the form of assertive types as many as 5 data functions stating as many as 5 data. The directive type is 5 data, the function invites 4 data and challenges 1 data. The type of commissive as much as 2 data function threatens as much as 2 data. There are 9 types of expressive functions that insult or criticize as many as 9 data. The most common types and functions of expressive speech acts are due to the fact that in hate speech utterances place more emphasis on the psychological condition of the speaker in uttering or expressing his situation or what the speaker is feeling.


Keywords


Chinese Ethnicity; Illocutionary Speech Acts; Psychological

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afriyandi, R. (2021). Analisis Ujaran Kebencian Dalam Bermedia Sosial : Kajian Atas Semangat Perdamaian Dalam Al-Quar'an. Jurnal Of Islamic Civilization, 24-33.

Devita Indah Permatasari, & Subyantoro. (2017-2019). Ujaran Kebencian Facebook. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 62-70.

Dr. Sholihatin. (2019). Linguistik Forensik dan Kejahatan Berbahasa. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Kurnia. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Berbahasa Pada Sosial Media Instagram Dalam Postingan, Komentar, dan Cerita Singkat. Jurnal Serunai Bahasa Indonesia, 49-57.

Kurniasih, D. (2019). Ujaran Kebencian Diruang Publik: Analisis Pragmatik pada Data Pusat Studi Agama dan Perdamaian (PSAP). Jurnal Studi Agama dan Masyarakat, 49-57.

Leech. (1993). Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatic. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Nadar. (2009). Pragmatik dan Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Permatasari, D. I, & Subyantoro, S. (2017-2019). Ujaran Kebencian Facebook. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 62-70.

Prahastiwi, A. H, Haryadi, H, & Baehaqie, I. (2018). Tindakan Tutur Ilokusi di Pondok Modern Selamat Kendal. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 132-139.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2022, November 6). Direktori Putusan. Retrieved Maret 5, 2022, from Putusan Mahkamah Agung: https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/

Ridho, M. (2018). Ujaran Kebencian dalam Dakwah: Analisis Tentang Pengejawantahan Ide Amar Ma'ruf Nahi Mungkar di Kalanagan Para Da'i. Kalimantan Timur: Lentera.

Rohmatin. (2019). Ujaran Kebencian Dalam Ceramah Habib Bahar Bin Smith di Media Sosisal Youtube Perspektif Neopragmatisme Richard Rorty .

T Fatimah Djajasudarma. (2012). Wacana Pragmatic. Bandung: Bandung Refika Aditama.

Winani, & Endang Widi. (2018). Teori dan Praktik Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.53712/jk.v8i1.2172

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Supported by:

Indexing