PENGARUH RASIO LIKUIDITAS DAN PENGUNGKAPAN INFORMASI LINGKUNGAN TERHADAP HARGA SAHAM: STUDI PADA SEKTOR PROPERTI DAN REAL ESTATE DI INDONESIA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study aims to investigate the impact of liquidity ratios and environmental information disclosure on the stock prices of property and real estate companies in Indonesia. The research employs a quantitative approach and uses secondary data from annual reports and sustainability reports of companies for the period 2022-2023. Data analysis was conducted using SmartPLS to examine the relationships between variables. The results show that neither liquidity ratios nor environmental information disclosure have a significant impact on stock prices, with path coefficients of -0.455 and 0.265, and T-statistics of 1.166 and 0.869, respectively. These findings suggest that factors such as financial stability and environmental transparency may not be strong enough to influence investor perceptions and stock prices in the context of the property and real estate market in Indonesia. This research highlights the need for company management to balance environmental disclosure and financial considerations to maintain investor confidence.
Keywords: liquidity ratios; environmental information disclosure; stock prices
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki pengaruh rasio likuiditas dan pengungkapan informasi lingkungan terhadap harga saham perusahaan properti dan real estate di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif serta data sekunder dari laporan tahunan dan laporan keberlanjutan perusahaan untuk periode 2022-2023. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan SmartPLS untuk menguji hubungan antara variabel. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa baik rasio likuiditas maupun pengungkapan informasi lingkungan tidak memiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap harga saham, dengan path coefficient masing-masing -0,455 dan 0,265 serta T-statistic 1,166 dan 0,869. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa faktor-faktor seperti stabilitas keuangan dan transparansi lingkungan mungkin tidak cukup kuat untuk mempengaruhi persepsi investor dan harga saham dalam konteks pasar properti dan real estate di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menyoroti perlunya manajemen perusahaan untuk menyeimbangkan antara pengungkapan lingkungan dan pertimbangan keuangan untuk menjaga kepercayaan investor.
Kata kunci: rasio likuiditas; pengungkapan informasi lingkungan; harga saham
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2019). Fundamentals of Financial Management. Cengage Learning.
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 303-327.
Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100.
UNFCCC. (2021). COP26 Goals. Retrieved from [UNFCCC COP26].
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2017). Peraturan OJK Nomor 51/POJK.03/2017 tentang Penerapan Keuangan Berkelanjutan bagi Lembaga Jasa Keuangan, Emiten, dan Perusahaan Publik.
Purwanto, A., & Agustin, J. (2017). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) terhadap Nilai Perusahaan dengan Kepemilikan Manajerial sebagai Variabel Moderating. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 14(1), 64-75.
Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. (2017). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 59 Tahun 2017 tentang Pelaksanaan Pencapaian Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan.
Siregar, S. V., & Bachtiar, Y. (2010). Corporate social reporting: Empirical evidence from Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 3(3), 241-252.
Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7-8), 1168-1188.
Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5-6), 447-471.
Wahba, H. (2008). Does the market value corporate environmental responsibility? An empirical examination. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(2), 89-99.
Hossain, M., Alam, M., & Islam, S. (2016). Environmental disclosures in financial reports and stakeholder satisfaction: An empirical study on public listed companies in Bangladesh. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 469-486.
Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2018). Investments. McGraw-Hill Education.
Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2019). The impact of liquidity on stock performance: Evidence from the financial sector. Journal of Financial Economics, 132(3), 586-604.
Kim, K., Ma, Y., & Nofsinger, J. (2016). Liquidity and volatility in the stock market: Evidence from high liquidity stocks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 70(C), 1-13.
Kolk, A. (2003). Trends in sustainability reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(5), 279-291.
Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937-967.
Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2008). Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting? Journal of International Management, 14(4), 364-376.
Clarkson, P. M., Overell, M. B., & Chapple, L. (2011). Environmental reporting and its relation to corporate environmental performance. Abacus, 47(1), 27-60.
Luo, L., Lan, Y. C., & Tang, Q. (2012). Corporate incentives to disclose carbon information: Evidence from the CDP Global 500 report. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 23(2), 93-120.
Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697-1724.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7-8), 639-647.
Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5-21.
Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2010). Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders? Journal of World Business, 45(4), 375-384.
Bhunia, A., & Sarkar, R. (2011). A study of liquidity management on profitability in Indian steel companies. British Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 1(1), 24-33.
Chen, N. F. (2010). Financial investment opportunities and the macroeconomy. Journal of Finance, 45(2), 529-554.
Kang, J., & Stulz, R. M. (1997). Why is there a home bias? An analysis of foreign portfolio equity ownership in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics, 46(1), 3-28.
Wang, J. (2010). Liquidity and stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(1), 126-151.
Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2006). Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns. Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645-1680.
Tetlock, P. C. (2007). Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market. Journal of Finance, 62(3), 1139-1168.
Lo, A. W., Mamaysky, H., & Wang, J. (2000). Foundations of technical analysis: Computational algorithms, statistical inference, and empirical implementation. Journal of Finance, 55(4), 1705-1765.
Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65-91.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.
Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2015). The economic relevance of environmental disclosure and its impact on corporate legitimacy: An empirical investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 431-450.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Age International.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson.
Rigdon, E. E. (2012). Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: In praise of simple methods. Long Range Planning, 45(5-6), 341-358.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2011). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414-433.
Wong, K. K.-K. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1-32.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
Alsahlawi, A. M., Chebbi, K., & Ammer, M. A. (2021). The Impact of Environmental Sustainability Disclosure on Stock Return of Saudi Listed Firms: The Moderating Role of Financial Constraints. International Journal of Financial Studies, 9(1), 4.
Xu, N., Liu, J., & Dou, H. (2022). Environmental, social, and governance information disclosure and stock price crash risk: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 977369.
Hussainey, K., & Salama, A. (2010). The importance of corporate environmental reputation to investors. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 11(3), 229-241.
Fowlie, M., Greenstone, M., & Wolfram, C. (2018). Do Energy Efficiency Investments Deliver? Evidence from the Weatherization Assistance Program. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(3), 1597-1644.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.53712/aktiva.v9i2.2319
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexing:
Member Of:
Reference Manager:
Published by Prodi Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Madura
Jl. Raya Panglegur Km 3,5 Pamekasan
Phone: (0324) 322231
website: http://ejournal.unira.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_aktiva/index
Email: jaa.unira@gmail.com
AKTIVA by Universitas Madura is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.